I petitioned the courts on my father's behalf under the Domestic Abuse Assistance Act (RS 46§2131, et. seq.)  for injunctive relief. Each of my four attempts was summarily dismissed without written explanation. It is my conjecture they were dismissed because that statute fails to specify "family members" among the enumerated classes of persons given standing to file on a victim's behalf. I believe this defect is a mere oversight and should be cured by remedial legislation. If my late father's abusers had simply been enjoined from isolating him, he would have had access to the "outside world" and the legal assistance he requested in which case he would most likely be alive today. Below is an argument presented in my final petition.

On the Question of Standing

46§2131.  DOMESTIC ABUSE ASSISTANCE: Purposes

The purpose of this Part is to recognize and address the complex legal and social problems created by domestic violence. The legislature finds that existing laws which regulate the dissolution of marriage do not adequately address problems of protecting and assisting the victims of domestic abuse. The legislature further finds that previous societal attitudes have been reflected in the policies and practices of law enforcement agencies and prosecutors which have resulted in different treatment of crimes occurring between family or household members and those occurring between strangers. It is the intent of the legislature to provide a civil remedy for domestic violence which will afford the victim immediate and easily accessible protection. Furthermore, it is the intent of the legislature that the official response of law enforcement agencies to cases of domestic violence shall stress the enforcement of laws to protect the victim and shall communicate the attitude that violent behavior is not excused or tolerated.

"Domestic abuse" also includes abuse of adults as defined in R.S. 14:403.2 when committed by an adult child or adult grandchild. (46:2132)

14§403.2.  OFFENSES AFFECTING LAW ENFORCEMENT: Abuse and neglect of adults; reports; investigation; waiver of privileges; penalties; immunity: Purposes

The purpose of this Section is to protect adults who cannot physically or mentally protect themselves and who are harmed or threatened with harm through action or inaction by themselves or by the individuals responsible for their care.

"Abuse" is the infliction of physical or mental injury on an adult by other parties, including but not limited to such means as sexual abuse, abandonment, isolation, exploitation, or extortion of funds or other things of value, to such an extent that his health, self-determination, or emotional well-being is endangered. (14:403.2)

(7.1) "Isolation" includes:

(a) Intentional acts committed for the purpose of preventing, and which do serve to prevent, an adult from having contact with family, friends, or concerned persons. This shall not be construed to affect a legal restraining order.

(b) Intentional acts committed to prevent an adult from receiving his mail or telephone calls.

(c) Intentional acts of physical or chemical restraint of an adult committed for the purpose of preventing contact with visitors, family, friends, or other concerned persons.

(d) Intentional acts which restrict, place, or confine an adult in a restricted area for the purposes of social deprivation or preventing contact with family, friends, visitors, or other concerned persons. (14:403.2)


An elder who is "isolated" is prevented from petitioning on his own behalf

An elder who "cannot physically or mentally protect" himself from domestic abuse, who is prevented by an "adult grandchild" or "by the individuals responsible for [his] care" "from having contact with family, friends, or concerned persons", who is prevented "from receiving his mail or telephone calls" and is confined to a restricted area can not reasonably be expected to petition on his own behalf to seek "a civil remedy for abuse". If he is to be protected it is therefore necessary that someone else have standing to file on his behalf.
 

Prosecutors may petition on the elder’s behalf, but can not be relied upon to do so

While the standing of prosecutors to file on the elder’s behalf is expressly provided for, the legislature had found these same authorities treat abuse occurring between family members differently than abuse occurring between strangers - by which "differently" is plainly understood to mean "inadequately", or else the legislature would have found no need to create a civil remedy for domestic abuse.

It is absurd to suppose the legislature would create "a civil remedy for domestic violence" and intend that its power lay exclusively in the hands of the very authorities whose recalcitrance it had observed and was attempting to remedy.

A parent may petition on behalf of "any person" alleged to be incompetent

The provision that "[a]ny parent, adult household member, or district attorney may seek relief on behalf of any minor child or any person alleged to be incompetent..." does not stress the relationship between a petitioner and a protected person alleged to be incompetent as the protected person may be "any person". It is therefore reasonably construed that any adult family member may seek relief on behalf of any family member alleged to be incompetent.

An adult child should have standing to petition on behalf of his parent

If the construction above is valid then an adult child may certainly petition on behalf of a parent alleged to be incompetent.

Alternatively, as the petitioner’s standing to file on his father’s behalf is not excluded by the text of 46§2131, and legislative purpose demands that a parent, alleged to be incompetent, isolated and otherwise abused by an adult grandchild be protected from domestic abuse but can not himself petition the court or rely upon a prosecutor to protect him, it is therefore necessary that an adult family member have standing to file on his behalf.

It should never be necessary to subject a falsely imprisoned elder to the ordeal of interdiction simply to save him from abusive circumstances to which he never consented and which he, himself, intelligently protests. If an adult child may petition for his parent’s interdiction, the adult child should have standing to petition for a less drastic remedy to domestic abuse.

I believe it is consistent with legislative intent and well within the court’s discretion to recognize my standing to petition on my father’s behalf in this matter. I therefore respectfully ask this right and duty be understood.